| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Purdue University
Indiana University
Purdue University
It remains a matter of controversy precisely what kind of neural mechanisms underlie functional asymmetries in speech processing. Whereas some studies support speech-specific circuits, others suggest that lateralization is dictated by relative computational demands of complex auditory signals in the spectral or time domains. To examine how the brain processes linguistically relevant spectral and temporal information, a functional magnetic resonance imaging study was conducted using Thai speech, in which spectral processing associated with lexical tones and temporal processing associated with vowel length can be differentiated. Ten Thai and 10 Chinese subjects were asked to perform discrimination judgments of pitch and timing patterns presented in the same auditory stimuli under two different conditions: speech (Thai) and nonspeech (hums). In the speech condition, tasks required judging Thai tones (T) and vowel length (VL); in the nonspeech condition, homologous pitch contours (P) and duration patterns (D). A remaining task required listening passively to nonspeech hums (L). Only the Thai group showed activation in the left inferior prefrontal cortex in speech minus nonspeech contrasts for spectral (T vs. P) and temporal (VL vs. D) cues. Thai and Chinese groups, however, exhibited similar fronto-parietal activation patterns in nonspeech hums minus passive listening contrasts for spectral (P vs. L) and temporal (D vs. L) cues. It appears that lower level specialization for acoustic cues in the spectral and temporal domains cannot be generalized to abstract higher order levels of phonological processing. Regardless of the neural mechanisms underlying low-level auditory processing, our findings clearly indicate that hemispheric specialization is sensitive to language-specific factors.
Key Words: Language • fMRI • Thai • Chinese • Human auditory processing • Speech perception • Phonology • Temporal processing • Spectral processing • Vowel duration • Tones
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. K. Ischebeck, A. D. Friederici, and K. Alter Processing Prosodic Boundaries in Natural and Hummed Speech: An fMRI Study Cereb Cortex, March 1, 2008; 18(3): 541 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Luo, J.-T. Ni, Z.-H. Li, X.-O. Li, D.-R. Zhang, F.-G. Zeng, and L. Chen Opposite patterns of hemisphere dominance for early auditory processing of lexical tones and consonants PNAS, December 19, 2006; 103(51): 19558 - 19563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. L. Jamison, K. E. Watkins, D. V. M. Bishop, and P. M. Matthews Hemispheric Specialization for Processing Auditory Nonspeech Stimuli Cereb Cortex, September 1, 2006; 16(9): 1266 - 1275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. McNealy, J. C. Mazziotta, and M. Dapretto Cracking the language code: neural mechanisms underlying speech parsing. J. Neurosci., July 19, 2006; 26(29): 7629 - 7639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. C. LoCasto, D. Krebs-Noble, R. P. Gullapalli, and M. W. Burton An fMRI Investigation of Speech and Tone Segmentation J. Cogn. Neurosci., November 1, 2004; 16(9): 1612 - 1624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Dehaene-Lambertz and T. Gliga Common Neural Basis for Phoneme Processing in Infants and Adults J. Cogn. Neurosci., September 1, 2004; 16(8): 1375 - 1387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| NEURAL COMPUTATION | J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE | MIT PRESS JOURNALS |
