HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by MacSweeney, M. Articles by Brammer, M. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by MacSweeney, M. Articles by Brammer, M. J.

Neural Correlates of British Sign Language Comprehension: Spatial Processing Demands of Topographic Language

University College London

Bencie Woll

City University, London

Ruth Campbell

University College London

Gemma A. Calvert

University of Oxford

Philip K. McGuire, Anthony S. David, Andrew Simmons and Michael J. Brammer

Institute of Psychiatry, London

In all signed languages used by deaf people, signs are executed in "sign space" in front of the body. Some signed sentences use this space to map detailed "real-world" spatial relationships directly. Such sentences can be considered to exploit sign space "topographically." Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we explored the extent to which increasing the topographic processing demands of signed sentences was reflected in the differential recruitment of brain regions in deaf and hearing native signers of the British Sign Language. When BSL signers performed a sentence anomaly judgement task, the occipito-temporal junction was activated bilaterally to a greater extent for topographic than nontopographic processing. The differential role of movement in the processing of the two sentence types may account for this finding. In addition, enhanced activation was observed in the left inferior and superior parietal lobules during processing of topographic BSL sentences. We argue that the left parietal lobe is specifically involved in processing the precise configuration and location of hands in space to represent objects, agents, and actions. Importantly, no differences in these regions were observed when hearing people heard and saw English translations of these sentences.

Despite the high degree of similarity in the neural systems underlying signed and spoken languages, exploring the linguistic features which are unique to each of these broadens our understanding of the systems involved in language comprehension.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Rudner and J. Ronnberg Explicit Processing Demands Reveal Language Modality-Specific Organization of Working Memory J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., October 1, 2008; 13(4): 466 - 484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Campbell, M. MacSweeney, and D. Waters Sign Language and the Brain: A Review J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., January 1, 2008; 13(1): 3 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Atkinson The Perceptual Characteristics of Voice-Hallucinations in Deaf People: Insights into the Nature of Subvocal Thought and Sensory Feedback Loops Schizophr Bull, October 1, 2006; 32(4): 701 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. L. Sakai, Y. Tatsuno, K. Suzuki, H. Kimura, and Y. Ichida Sign and speech: amodal commonality in left hemisphere dominance for comprehension of sentences Brain, June 1, 2005; 128(6): 1407 - 1417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Buccino, F. Lui, N. Canessa, I. Patteri, G. Lagravinese, F. Benuzzi, C. A. Porro, and G. Rizzolatti Neural Circuits Involved in the Recognition of Actions Performed by Nonconspecifics: An fMRI Study J. Cogn. Neurosci., January 1, 2004; 16(1): 114 - 126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]