HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Witton, C. Articles by Talcott, J. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Witton, C. Articles by Talcott, J. B.

Separate Influences of Acoustic AM and FM Sensitivity on the Phonological Decoding Skills of Impaired and Normal Readers

University Laboratory of Physiology, Oxford University, UK
Neurosciences Research Institute, Aston University, Birmingham, UK

John F. Stein and Catherine J. Stoodley

University Laboratory of Physiology, Oxford University, UK

Burton S. Rosner

Phonetics Laboratory, Oxford University, UK

Joel B. Talcott

University Laboratory of Physiology, Oxford University, UK
Neurosciences Research Institute, Aston University, Birmingham, UK

Developmental dyslexia is associated with deficits in the processing of basic auditory stimuli. Yet it is unclear how these sensory impairments might contribute to poor reading skills. This study better characterizes the relationship between phonological decoding skills, the lack of which is generally accepted to comprise the core deficit in reading disabilities, and auditory sensitivity to amplitude modulation (AM) and frequency modulation (FM). Thirty-eight adult subjects, 17 of whom had a history of developmental dyslexia, completed a battery of psychophysical measures of sensitivity to FM and AM at different modulation rates, along with a measure of pseudoword reading accuracy and standardized assessments of literacy and cognitive skills. The subjects with a history of dyslexia were significantly less sensitive than controls to 2-Hz FM and 20-Hz AM only. The absence of a significant group difference for 2-Hz AM shows that the dyslexics do not have a general deficit in detecting all slow modulations. Thresholds for detecting 2-Hz and 240-Hz FM and 20-Hz AM correlated significantly with pseudoword reading accuracy. After accounting for various cognitive skills, however, multiple regression analyses showed that detection thresholds for both 2-Hz FM and 20-Hz AM were significant and independent predictors of pseudoword reading ability in the entire sample. Thresholds for 2-Hz AM and 240-Hz FM did not explain significant additional variance in pseudoword reading skill. It is therefore possible that certain components of auditory processing of modulations are related to phonological decoding skills, whereas others are not.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Dawes and D. V. M. Bishop Maturation of Visual and Auditory Temporal Processing in School-Aged Children J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2008; 51(4): 1002 - 1015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. W. Roach and J. H. Hogben Impaired filtering of behaviourally irrelevant visual information in dyslexia Brain, March 1, 2007; 130(3): 771 - 785. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. Kidd and J. H. Hogben Development of auditory saltation and its relationship to reading and phonological processing. J Speech Lang Hear Res, April 1, 2006; 49(2): 352 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. C. Mimran Temporal processing deficits in hebrew speaking children with reading disabilities. J Speech Lang Hear Res, February 1, 2006; 49(1): 127 - 137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]