J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pavlovskaya, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hochstein, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pavlovskaya, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hochstein, S.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2002;14:745-756.)
© 2002 The MIT Press

Searching with Unilateral Neglect

Marina Pavlovskaya, Haim Ring and Zeev Groswasser

Loewenstein Rehabilitation Hospital, Raanana
Tel Aviv University

Shaul Hochstein

Hebrew University

We address two longstanding conflicts in the visual search and unilateral neglect literature by studying feature and conjunction search performance of neglect patients using laterally presented search arrays. The first issue relates to whether feature search is performed independently of attention, or rather requires "spread attention." If feature search is "preattentive," it should survive neglect. However, we find neglect effects for both feature and conjunction search, suggesting that feature search, too, has an attentional requirement. The second controversy refers to the space- or object-based nature of neglect following unilateral right-hemisphere parietal lobe damage. If neglect were a purely spatial phenomenon, then we would expect no detriment in performance in the right (nonneglect) field, and diminished performance for the whole left (neglect) field. On the other hand, if neglect were purely object-based, we would expect diminished performance on the left side of the search array, irrespective of its location in the visual field. We now demonstrate a combination of strong object-based and space-based neglect effects for conjunction search with laterally placed element arrays, suggesting that these two mechanisms work in tandem.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
T. M. Van Vleet and L. C. Robertson
Cross-modal Interactions in Time and Space: Auditory Influence on Visual Attention in Hemispatial Neglect.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., August 1, 2006; 18(8): 1368 - 1379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
A. Kristjansson, P. Vuilleumier, P. Malhotra, M. Husain, and J. Driver
Priming of Color and Position during Visual Search in Unilateral Spatial Neglect
J. Cogn. Neurosci., June 1, 2005; 17(6): 859 - 873.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
R. Ptak and N. Valenza
The Inferior Temporal Lobe Mediates Distracter-Resistant Visual Search of Patients with Spatial Neglect
J. Cogn. Neurosci., May 1, 2005; 17(5): 788 - 789.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2002 by The MIT Press.