|
|
||||||||
MIT Sloan School of Management
Boston University
A longstanding controversy in economics and finance is whether financial markets are governed by rational forces or by emotional responses. We study the importance of emotion in the decision-making process of professional securities traders by measuring their physiological characteristics (e.g., skin conductance, blood volume pulse, etc.) during live trading sessions while simultaneously capturing real-time prices from which market events can be detected. In a sample of 10 traders, we find statistically significant differences in mean electrodermal responses during transient market events relative to no-event control periods, and statistically significant mean changes in cardiovascular variables during periods of heightened market volatility relative to normal-volatility control periods. We also observe significant differences in these physiological responses across the 10 traders that may be systematically related to the traders' levels of experience.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. M. Coates and J. Herbert Endogenous steroids and financial risk taking on a London trading floor PNAS, April 22, 2008; 105(16): 6167 - 6172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Preuschoff, S. R. Quartz, and P. Bossaerts Human Insula Activation Reflects Risk Prediction Errors As Well As Risk J. Neurosci., March 12, 2008; 28(11): 2745 - 2752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| NEURAL COMPUTATION | J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE | MIT PRESS JOURNALS |