|
|
||||||||
University of Tokyo
Sophia University
Right-handed participants performed the categorical and coordinate spatial relation judgments on stimuli presented to either the left visual fieldright hemisphere (LVF-RH) or the right visual fieldleft hemisphere (RVF-LH). The stimulus patterns were formulated either by bright dots or by contrast-balanced dots. When the stimuli were bright, an RVF-LH advantage was observed for the categorical task, whereas an LVF-RH advantage was observed for the coordinate task. When the stimuli were contrast balanced, the RVF-LH advantage was observed for the categorical task, but the LVF-RH advantage was eliminated for the coordinate task. Because the contrast-balanced dots are largely devoid of low spatial frequency content, these results suggest that processing of low spatial frequency is responsible for the right hemisphere advantage for the coordinate spatial processing.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Mercure, F. Dick, H. Halit, J. Kaufman, and M. H. Johnson Differential Lateralization for Words and Faces: Category or Psychophysics? J. Cogn. Neurosci., November 1, 2008; 20(11): 2070 - 2087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Okubo and C. Michimata The Role of High Spatial Frequencies in Hemispheric Processing of Categorical and Coordinate Spatial Relations J. Cogn. Neurosci., November 1, 2004; 16(9): 1576 - 1582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| NEURAL COMPUTATION | J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE | MIT PRESS JOURNALS |