HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Behrmann, M. Articles by Kass, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Behrmann, M. Articles by Kass, R.

Mechanisms Underlying Spatial Representation Revealed Through Studies of Hemispatial Neglect

Carnegie Mellon University

Thea Ghiselli-Crippa and John A. Sweeney

University of Pittsburgh

Ilaria Di Matteo and Robert Kass

Carnegie Mellon University

The representations that mediate the coding of spatial position were examined by comparing the behavior of patients with left hemispatial neglect with that of nonneurological control subjects. To determine the spatial coordinate system(s) used to define "left" and "right," eye movements were measured for targets that appeared at 5°, 10°, and 15° to the relative left or right defined with respect to the midline of the eyes, or head or midsaggital plane of the trunk. In the baseline condition, in which the various egocentric midlines were all aligned with the environmental midline, patients were disproportionately slower at initiating saccades to left than right targets, relative to the controls. When either the trunk or the head was rotated and the midline aligned with the most peripheral position while the eyes remained aligned with the midline of the environment, the results did not differ from the baseline condition. However, when the eyes were rotated and the midline aligned with the peripheral position, saccadic reaction time (SRT) differed significantly from the baseline, especially when the eyes were rotated to the right. These findings suggest that target position is coded relative to the current position of gaze (oculocentrically) and that this eye-centered coding is modulated by orbital position (eye-in-head signal). The findings dovetail well with results from existing neurophysiological studies and shed further light on the spatial representations mediated by the human parietal cortex.

Key Words: Parietal • Spatial representations • Frame of reference

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Molenberghs, C. R. Gillebert, R. Peeters, and R. Vandenberghe Convergence between Lesion-Symptom Mapping and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Spatially Selective Attention in the Intact Brain J. Neurosci., March 26, 2008; 28(13): 3359 - 3373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Vuilleumier, C. Sergent, S. Schwartz, N. Valenza, M. Girardi, M. Husain, and J. Driver Impaired Perceptual Memory of Locations across Gaze-shifts in Patients with Unilateral Spatial Neglect. J. Cogn. Neurosci., August 1, 2007; 19(8): 1388 - 1406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Doricchi, P. Guariglia, F. Figliozzi, M. Silvetti, G. Bruno, and M. Gasparini Causes of cross-over in unilateral neglect: between-group comparisons, within-patient dissociations and eye movements Brain, June 1, 2005; 128(6): 1386 - 1406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]