J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Slotnick, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Hart, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Slotnick, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Hart, J.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2001;13:1088-1096.)
© 2001 The MIT Press

Hemispheric Asymmetry in Categorical Versus Coordinate Visuospatial Processing Revealed by Temporary Cortical Deactivation

Scott D. Slotnick, Lauren R. Moo, Mark A. Tesoro and John Hart

Johns Hopkins University

Kosslyn (1987) proposed that the left hemisphere is better than the right hemisphere at categorical visuospatial processing while the right hemisphere is better than the left hemisphere at coordinate visuospatial processing. In 134 patients, one hemisphere (and then usually the other) was temporarily deactivated by intracarotid injection of sodium amobarbital. After a hemisphere was deactivated, a cognitive test battery was conducted, which included categorical and coordinate visuospatial tasks. Using this technique, the processing capabilities of the intact hemisphere could be determined, thus directly testing Kosslyn's hypothesis regarding hemispheric specialization. Specifically, if the left hemisphere does preferentially process categorical visuospatial relationships, then its deactivation should result in more errors during categorical tasks than right hemisphere deactivation and vise versa for the right hemisphere regarding coordinate tasks. The pattern of results obtained in both categorical and coordinate tasks was consistent with Kosslyn's hypothesis when task difficulty was sufficiently high. However, when task difficulty was low, a left hemispheric processing advantage was found for both types of tasks indicating that: (1) the left hemisphere may be better at "easy" tasks regardless of the type of task and (2) the proposed hemispheric processing asymmetry may only become apparent during sufficiently demanding task conditions. These results may explain why some investigators have failed to find a significant hemispheric processing asymmetry in visuospatial categorical and coordinate tasks.


Key Words: Categorical processing • Coordinate processing • Hemispheric asymmetry • Task difficulty • Neuropsychological testing • Intracarotid amobarbital procedure




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
E. Liebenthal, J. R. Binder, S. M. Spitzer, E. T. Possing, and D. A. Medler
Neural Substrates of Phonemic Perception
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2005; 15(10): 1621 - 1631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
T. Indersmitten and R. C. Gur
Emotion Processing in Chimeric Faces: Hemispheric Asymmetries in Expression and Recognition of Emotions
J. Neurosci., May 1, 2003; 23(9): 3820 - 3825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2001 by The MIT Press.