HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Slachevsky, A. Articles by Dubois, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Slachevsky, A. Articles by Dubois, B.

Preserved Adjustment but Impaired Awareness in a Sensory–Motor Conflict following Prefrontal Lesions

Inserm EPI 007, Paris
Hôpital de la Salpêtrière, Paris

Pierre Fourneret

Institut des Sciences Cognitives, Lyon

Pascale Pradat-Diehl

Hôpital de la Salpêtrière, Paris

Marc Jeannerod

Institut des Sciences Cognitives, Lyon

Bruno Dubois

Inserm EPI 007, Paris
Hôpital de la Salpêtrière, Paris

Control of action occurs at different stages of the executive process, in particular at those of sensory–motor integration and conscious monitoring. The aim of this study was to determine the implication of the prefrontal cortex in the control of action. For that purpose, we compared the performance of 15 patients with frontal lobe lesions and 15 matched controls on an experimental paradigm generating a conflict between the action planned and the sensory–motor feedback. Subjects had to trace a sagittal line with a stylus on a graphic tablet. The hand was hidden by a mirror on which the traced line, processed by a computer, was projected. Without informing the subjects, the line traced was modified by introducing a bias to the right, which increased progressively from 2° to 42°. To succeed the task, subjects had to modify their motor program and deviate their hand in the opposite direction. The sensory–motor adjustment to the bias was evaluated by the surface between the line traced and the ideal line to compensate for the deviation. The awareness of the conflict was measured by the angle of the bias at which subjects expressed the feeling that the line they traced was not the same as the line they saw. The deviation was similarly compensated for by patients and controls until 24°. Then 14 controls but only 3 patients were aware of a conflict. After that, the variability of performance increased significantly for the unaware patients. These results suggest that the prefrontal cortex is required at the level of conscious monitoring of actions, but not at the level of sensory–motor integration.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. S. McCabe, H. Cohen, and D. R. Blake Somaesthetic disturbances in fibromyalgia are exaggerated by sensory motor conflict: implications for chronicity of the disease? Rheumatology, October 1, 2007; 46(10): 1587 - 1592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Synofzik, P. Thier, and A. Lindner Internalizing Agency of Self-Action: Perception of One's Own Hand Movements Depends on an Adaptable Prediction About the Sensory Action Outcome J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2006; 96(3): 1592 - 1601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Dubois, A. Slachevsky, B. Pillon, R. Beato, J. M. Villalponda, and I. Litvan "Applause sign" helps to discriminate PSP from FTD and PD Neurology, June 28, 2005; 64(12): 2132 - 2133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Hunter, J. Katz, and K. D. Davis The effect of tactile and visual sensory inputs on phantom limb awareness Brain, March 1, 2003; 126(3): 579 - 589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]