HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Regnault, P. Articles by Besson, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Regnault, P. Articles by Besson, M.

Different Brain Mechanisms Mediate Sensitivity to Sensory Consonance and Harmonic Context: Evidence from Auditory Event-Related Brain Potentials

¹ National Center for Scientific Research, Marseille, France
² Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France

The goal of this study was to analyze the time-course of sensory (bottom-up) and cognitive (top-down) processes that govern musical harmonic expectancy. Eight-chord sequences were presented to 12 musicians and 12 nonmusicians. Expectations for the last chord were manipulated both at the sensory level (i.e., the last chord was sensory consonant or dissonant) and at the cognitive level (the harmonic function of the target was varied by manipulating the harmonic context built up by the first six chords of the sequence). Changes in the harmonic function of the target chord mainly modulate the amplitude of a positive component peaking around 300 msec (P3) after target onset, reflecting top-down influences on the perceptual stages of processing. In contrast, changes in the acoustic structure of the target chord (sensory consonance) mainly modulate the amplitude of a late positive component that develops between 300 and 800 msec after target onset. Most importantly, the effects of sensory consonance and harmonic context on the event-related brain potentials associated with the target chords were found to be independent, thus suggesting that two separate processors contribute to the building up of musical expectancy.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Poulin-Charronnat, E. Bigand, and S. Koelsch Processing of Musical Syntax Tonic versus Subdominant: An Event-related Potential Study. J. Cogn. Neurosci., September 1, 2006; 18(9): 1545 - 1554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Steinbeis, S. Koelsch, and J. A. Sloboda The role of harmonic expectancy violations in musical emotions: evidence from subjective, physiological, and neural responses. J. Cogn. Neurosci., August 1, 2006; 18(8): 1380 - 1393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Schon and M. Besson Visually Induced Auditory Expectancy in Music Reading: A Behavioral and Electrophysiological Study J. Cogn. Neurosci., April 1, 2005; 17(4): 694 - 705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Fujioka, L. J. Trainor, B. Ross, R. Kakigi, and C. Pantev Musical Training Enhances Automatic Encoding of Melodic Contour and Interval Structure J. Cogn. Neurosci., July 1, 2004; 16(6): 1010 - 1021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Koelsch, T. Grossmann, T. C. Gunter, A. Hahne, E. Schroger, and A. D. Friederici Children Processing Music: Electric Brain Responses Reveal Musical Competence and Gender Differences J. Cogn. Neurosci., July 1, 2003; 15(5): 683 - 693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]