J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Winkler, I.
Right arrow Articles by Cowan, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Winkler, I.
Right arrow Articles by Cowan, N.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2001;13:59-71.)
© 2001 The MIT Press

The Role of Large-Scale Memory Organization in The Mismatch Negativity Event-Related Brain Potential

István Winkler1,2, Erich Schröger3 and Nelson Cowan4

1 Hungarian Academy of Sciences
2 University of Helsinki
3 Universität Leipzig
4 University of Missouri

The mismatch negativity (MMN) component of event-related brain potentials is elicited by infrequent changes in regular acoustic sequences even if the participant is not actively listening to the sound sequence. Therefore, the MMN is assumed to result from a preattentive process in which an incoming sound is checked against the automatically detected regularities of the auditory sequence and is found to violate them. For example, presenting a discriminably different (deviant) sound within the sequence of a repetitive (standard) sound elicits the MMN. In the present article, we tested whether the memory organization of the auditory sequence can affect the preattentive change detection indexed by the MMN. In Experiment 1, trains of six standard tones were presented with a short, 0.5-sec stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between tones in the train. This was followed by a variable SOA between the last standard and the deviant tone (the "irregular presentation" condition). Of 12 participants displaying an MMN at the 0.5-sec predeviant SOA, it was elicited by 11 with the 2-sec predeviant SOA, in 5 participants with the 7-sec SOA, and in none with the 10-sec SOA. In Experiment 2, we repeated the 7-sec irregular predeviant SOA condition, along with a "regular presentation" condition in which the SOA between any two tones was 7 sec. MMN was elicited in about half of the participants (9 out of 16) in the irregular presentation condition, whereas in the regular presentation condition, MMN was elicited in all participants. These results cannot be explained on the basis of memory-strength decay but can be interpreted in terms of automatic, auditory preperceptual grouping principles. In the irregular presentation condition, the close grouping of standards may cause them to become irrelevant to the mismatch process when the deviant tone is presented after a long silent break. Because the MMN indexes preattentive auditory processing, the present results provide evidence that large-scale preperceptual organization of auditory events occurs despite attention being directed away from the auditory stimuli.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
M. Fabiani, K. A. Low, E. Wee, J. J. Sable, and G. Gratton
Reduced suppression or labile memory? Mechanisms of inefficient filtering of irrelevant information in older adults.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., April 1, 2006; 18(4): 637 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
T. Jacobsen, E. Schroger, I. Winkler, and J. Horvath
Familiarity Affects the Processing of Task-irrelevant Auditory Deviance
J. Cogn. Neurosci., November 1, 2005; 17(11): 1704 - 1713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
T. L. van Zuijen, E. Sussman, I. Winkler, R. Naatanen, and M. Tervaniemi
Grouping of Sequential Sounds--An Event-Related Potential Study Comparing Musicians and Nonmusicians
J. Cogn. Neurosci., February 1, 2003; 16(2): 331 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2001 by The MIT Press.