J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cornish, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cross, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cornish, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cross, G.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2001;13:144-150.)
© 2001 The MIT Press

Differential Impact of the FMR-1 Full Mutation on Memory and Attention Functioning: A Neuropsychological Perspective

Kim M. Cornish1, Fehmidah Munir1 and Gareth Cross1

1 University of Nottingham, UK

Memory and attention processing were examined in a group of 15 adult Fragile-X syndrome (FXS) males with Fragile-X mental retardation 1 (FMR-1) full mutation and compared to two control groups: a learning disabled (LD) control and a normal functioning control. Performance was assessed across a wide range of tasks including working memory, recognition memory, selective attention, sustained attention, and attentional switching. All three groups performed at a comparable level on recognition memory tasks, and the Fragile-X males and LD control group performed worse than the control group on tasks of working memory and sustained attention. On a task of executive function, the Fragile-X males demonstrated a significant deficit in comparison to the LD control group and the normal control group, but performed better than the LD control group and at a comparable level to the control group on tasks of selective attention. Molecular analyses of the lymphocyte DNA provided little evidence for a correlation between expansion size and performance on tasks of memory and attention. The findings from the present study are discussed in the context of functional neuroimaging and brain–behavior–molecular correlates.


Key Words: Fragile-X syndrome • Adult males • Memory • Attention processes • Cognitive–molecular correlations




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
C. L. Gatto and K. Broadie
Temporal requirements of the fragile X mental retardation protein in the regulation of synaptic structure
Development, August 1, 2008; 135(15): 2637 - 2648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soc Cogn Affect NeurosciHome page
E. J. Marco and D. H. Skuse
Autism-lessons from the X chromosome
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, December 1, 2006; 1(3): 183 - 193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
G. Scerif, A. Karmiloff-Smith, R. Campos, M. Elsabbagh, J. Driver, and K. Cornish
To Look or Not to Look? Typical and Atypical Development of Oculomotor Control
J. Cogn. Neurosci., April 1, 2005; 17(4): 591 - 604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Gen PsychiatryHome page
A. S. Garrett, V. Menon, K. MacKenzie, and A. L. Reiss
Here's Looking at You, Kid: Neural Systems Underlying Face and Gaze Processing in Fragile X Syndrome
Arch Gen Psychiatry, March 1, 2004; 61(3): 281 - 288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
C. S. Kogan, I. Boutet, K. Cornish, S. Zangenehpour, K. T. Mullen, J. J. A. Holden, V. M. Der Kaloustian, E. Andermann, and A. Chaudhuri
Differential impact of the FMR1 gene on visual processing in fragile X syndrome
Brain, March 1, 2004; 127(3): 591 - 601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2001 by The MIT Press.