J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by West, W. C.
Right arrow Articles by Holcomb, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by West, W. C.
Right arrow Articles by Holcomb, P. J.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2000;12:1024-1037.)
© 2000 The MIT Press


Article

Imaginal, Semantic, and Surface-Level Processing of Concrete and Abstract Words: An Electrophysiological Investigation

W. Caroline West

Massachusetts General Hospital

Phillip J. Holcomb

Tufts University, Massachusetts

Words representing concrete concepts are processed more quickly and efficiently than words representing abstract concepts. Concreteness effects have also been observed in studies using event-related brain potentials (ERPs). The aim of this study was to examine concrete and abstract words using both reaction time (RT) and ERP measurements to determine (1) at what point in the stream of cognitive processing concreteness effects emerge and (2) how different types of cognitive operations influence these concreteness effects. Three groups of subjects performed a sentence verification task in which the final word of each sentence was concrete or abstract. For each group the truthfulness judgment required either (1) image generation, (2) a semantic decision, or (3) evaluation of surface characteristics. Concrete and abstract words produced similar RTs and ERPs in the surface task, suggesting that postlexical semantic processing is necessary to elicit concreteness effects. In both the semantic and imagery tasks, RTs were shorter for concrete than for abstract words. This difference was greatest in the imagery task. Also, in both of these tasks concrete words elicited more negative ERPs than abstract words between 300 and 550 msec (N400). This effect was widespread across the scalp and may reflect activation in a linguistic semantic system common to both concrete and abstract words. ERPs were also more negative for concrete than abstract words between 550 and 800 msec. This effect was more frontally distributed and was most evident in the imagery task. We propose that this later anterior effect represents a distinct ERP component (N700) that is sensitive to the use of mental imagery. The N700 may reflect the access of specific characteristics of the imaged item or activation in a working memory system specific to mental imagery. These results also support the extended dual-coding hypothesis that superior associative connections and the use of mental imagery both contribute to processing advantages for concrete words over abstract words.


Key Words: Event-Related Potential (ERP) • N400 • N700 • Mental imagery • Semantic processing • Concreteness • Semantic representation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. Thierry and Y. J. Wu
From the Cover: Brain potentials reveal unconscious translation during foreign-language comprehension
PNAS, July 24, 2007; 104(30): 12530 - 12535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
M. Friedrich and A. D. Friederici
N400-like Semantic Incongruity Effect in 19-Month-Olds: Processing Known Words in Picture Contexts
J. Cogn. Neurosci., September 1, 2004; 16(8): 1465 - 1477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
B. Giesbrecht, C. C. Camblin, and T. Y. Swaab
Separable Effects of Semantic Priming and Imageability on Word Processing in Human Cortex
Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2004; 14(5): 521 - 529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2000 by The MIT Press.