| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Article |
Imperial College School of Medicine, London
University of Cambridge
Corresponding author. Division of Neuroscience and Psychological Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine, Charing Cross Campus, 10th Floor East Wing, St. Dunstans Road, London W6 8RP, UK. Tel.: +44-181-846-7712; fax: +44-181-846-7715; e-mail: t.hodgson{at}ic.ac.uk
In this paper, we describe a novel approach to the study of problem solving involving the detailed analysis of natural scanning eye movements during the "one-touch" Tower-of-London (TOL) task. We showed subjects a series of pictures depicting two arrangements of colored balls in pockets within the upper and lower halves of a computer display. The task was to plan (but not to execute) the shortest movement sequence required to rearrange the balls in one half of the display (the Workspace) to match the arrangement in the opposite half (the Goalspace) and indicate the minimum number of moves required for problem solution. We report that subjects are more likely to look towards the Goalspace in the initial period after picture presentation, but bias gaze towards the Workspace during the middle of trials. Towards the end of a trial, subjects are once again more likely to fixate the Goalspace. This pattern is found regardless of whether the subjects solve problems by rearranging the balls in the lower or upper visual fields, demonstrating that this strategy correlates with discrete phases in problem solving. A second experiment showed that efficient planners direct their gaze selectively towards the problem critical balls in the Workspace. In contrast, individuals who make errors spend more time looking at irrelevant items and are strongly influenced by the movement strategy needed to solve the preceding problem. We conclude that efficient solution of the TOL requires the capacity to generate and flexibly shift between control sets, including those underlying ocular scanning. The role of working memory and the prefrontal cerebral cortex in the task are discussed.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  T. Hodgson, M. Chamberlain, B. Parris, M. James, N. Gutowski, M. Husain, and C. Kennard The role of the ventrolateral frontal cortex in inhibitory oculomotor control Brain, June 1, 2007; 130(6): 1525 - 1537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. J. Leigh and C. Kennard Using saccades as a research tool in the clinical neurosciences Brain, March 1, 2004; 127(3): 460 - 477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. L. Hodgson, C. Golding, D. Molyva, C. R. Rosenthal, and C. Kennard Eye Movements during Task Switching: Reflexive, Symbolic, and Affective Contributions to Response Selection J. Cogn. Neurosci., February 1, 2004; 16(2): 318 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. P. Mosimann, J. Felblinger, P. Ballinari, C. W. Hess, and R. M. Muri Visual exploration behaviour during clock reading in Alzheimer's disease Brain, February 1, 2004; 127(2): 431 - 438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Terao, N. E. M. Andersson, J. R. Flanagan, and R. S. Johansson Engagement of Gaze in Capturing Targets for Future Sequential Manual Actions J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2002; 88(4): 1716 - 1725. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. KENNARD Scanpaths: The Path to Understanding Abnormal Cognitive Processing in Neurological Disease Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., April 1, 2002; 956(1): 242 - 249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A L M Pambakian, D S Wooding, N Patel, A B Morland, C Kennard, and S K Mannan Scanning the visual world: a study of patients with homonymous hemianopia J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, December 1, 2000; 69(6): 751 - 759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| NEURAL COMPUTATION | J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE | MIT PRESS JOURNALS |
