HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wiser, A. K. Articles by Hichwa, R. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wiser, A. K. Articles by Hichwa, R. D.

Novel vs. Well-learned Memory for Faces: A Positron Emission Tomography Study

University of Iowa
Instituto de Salud "Carlos III", Madrid

University of Iowa Department of Psychiatry MHCRC 200 Hawkins Drive #2911 JPP Iowa City IA 52242-1057, USA

Previous work has suggested that familiarity/novelty of learned materials affects the circuitry involved in memory, primarily in the size of activations rather than the pattern of activation. Although this work has examined both recall and recognition, it has been limited to verbal material. In this study, we set out to determine if the same result applies to nonverbal memory. We used the same experimental design, but used faces as the memory task. Healthy volunteers thoroughly learned a set of 18 faces a week prior to the Positron Emission Tomography (PET) experiment (well-learned memory) and were asked to remember another set of 18 faces, to which they were exposed 1 min before the PET experiment (novel memory). During the PET session, their task was to recognize the faces learned a week before and the faces seen a minute before; the "remembered faces" were interspersed among entirely new (distractor) faces. We found that, unlike for verbal material, the retention interval and the familiarity level of the faces affected both the pattern and the size of activations. Comparing the novel and well-learned recognition tasks revealed that novel memory for faces is primarily a frontal-lobe task, while well-learned recognition memory for faces utilizes a more distributed neural circuit, including visual areas, which appear to serve as memory-storage sites.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Tracy, A. Flanders, S. Madi, J. Laskas, E. Stoddard, A. Pyrros, P. Natale, and N. DelVecchio Regional Brain Activation Associated with Different Performance Patterns during Learning of a Complex Motor Skill Cereb Cortex, September 1, 2003; 13(9): 904 - 910. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Rossion, C. Schiltz, L. Robaye, D. Pirenne, and M. Crommelinck How Does the Brain Discriminate Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces?: A PET Study of Face Categorical Perception J. Cogn. Neurosci., October 1, 2001; 13(7): 1019 - 1034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. I. de Zubicaray, K. McMahon, S. J. Wilson, and S. Muthiah Brain Activity During the Encoding, Retention, and Retrieval of Stimulus Representations Learn. Mem., September 1, 2001; 8(5): 243 - 251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Jansma, N. F. Ramsey, H. A. Slagter, and R. S. Kahn Functional Anatomical Correlates of Controlled and Automatic Processing J. Cogn. Neurosci., August 1, 2001; 13(6): 730 - 743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]