HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Loeb, E. P. Articles by Bizzi, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Loeb, E. P. Articles by Bizzi, E.

Output Units of Motor Behavior: An Experimental and Modeling Study

^a Gore 2000, Nashville, TN., USA
^b Medical College of Pennsylvania and Hahnemann University
^c Massachusetts Institute of Technology
^d Northwestern University Medical School

Corresponding author

Cognitive approaches to motor control typically concern sequences of discrete actions without taking into account the stunning complexity of the geometry and dynamics of the muscles. This begs the question: Does the brain convert the intricate, continuous-time dynamics of the muscles into simpler discrete units of actions, and if so, how? One way for the brain to form discrete units of behavior from muscles is through the synergistic co-activation of muscles. While this possibility has long been known, the composition of potential muscle synergies has remained elusive. In this paper, we have focused on a method that allowed us to examine and compare the limb stabilization properties of all possible muscle combinations. We found that a small set (as few as 23 out of 65,536) of all possible combinations of 16 limb muscles are robust with respect to activation noise: these muscle combinations could stabilize the limb at predictable, restricted portions of the workspace in spite of broad variations in the force output of their component muscles. The locations at which the robust synergies stabilize the limb are not uniformly distributed throughout the leg's workspace, but rather, they cluster at four workspace areas. The simulated robust synergies are similar to the actual synergies we have previously found to be generated by activation of the spinal cord. Thus, we have developed a new analytical method that enabled us to select a few muscle synergies with interesting properties out of the set of possible muscle combinations. Beyond this, the identification of robustness as a common property of the synergies in simple motor behaviors will open the way to the study of dynamic stability, which is an important and distinct property of the vertebrate motor-control system.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. J. Kargo and S. F. Giszter Individual Premotor Drive Pulses, Not Time-Varying Synergies, Are the Units of Adjustment for Limb Trajectories Constructed in Spinal Cord J. Neurosci., March 5, 2008; 28(10): 2409 - 2425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. G. Carson Changes in muscle coordination with training J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2006; 101(5): 1506 - 1513. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Saltiel, K. Wyler-Duda, A. d'Avella, R. J. Ajemian, and E. Bizzi Localization and Connectivity in Spinal Interneuronal Networks: The Adduction-Caudal Extension-Flexion Rhythm in the Frog J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2005; 94(3): 2120 - 2138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. J. Kargo and L. C. Rome Functional morphology of proximal hindlimb muscles in the frog Rana pipiens J. Exp. Biol., July 15, 2002; 205(14): 1987 - 2004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Saltiel, K. Wyler-Duda, A. D'Avella, M. C. Tresch, and E. Bizzi Muscle Synergies Encoded Within the Spinal Cord: Evidence From Focal Intraspinal NMDA Iontophoresis in the Frog J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2001; 85(2): 605 - 619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]