J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harrington, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Cox, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harrington, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Cox, R. W.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 1999;12:56-77.)
© 1999 The MIT Press


Articles

Specialized Neural Systems Underlying Representations of Sequential Movements

Deborah L. Harringtona, Stephen M. Raob, Kathleen Y. Haalanda, Julie A. Bobholzb, Andrew R. Mayerb, Jeffrey R. Binderb and Robert W. Coxb

a Albuquerque Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of New Mexico
b Medical College of Wisconsin

Deborah L. Harrington, Ph.D., Psychology Service 116B, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 1501 San Pedro SE, Albuquerque, NM 87108, USA; E-mail: j613{at}unm.edu

The ease by which movements are combined into skilled actions depends on many factors, including the complexity of movement sequences. Complexity can be defined by the surface structure of a sequence, including motoric properties such as the types of effectors, and by the abstract or sequence-specific structure, which is apparent in the relations amongst movements, such as repetitions. It is not known whether different neural systems support the cognitive and the sensorimotor processes underlying different structural properties of sequential actions. We investigated this question using whole-brain functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in healthy adults as they performed sequences of five key presses involving up to three fingers. The structure of sequences was defined by two factors that independently lengthen the time to plan sequences before movement: the number of different fingers (1–3; surface structure) and the number of finger transitions (0–4; sequence-specific structure). The results showed that systems involved in visual processing (extrastriate cortex) and the preparation of sensory aspects of movement (rostral inferior parietal and ventral premotor cortex (PMv)) correlated with both properties of sequence structure. The number of different fingers positively correlated with activation intensity in the cerebellum and superior parietal cortex (anterior), systems associated with sensorimotor, and kinematic representations of movement, respectively. The number of finger transitions correlated with activation in systems previously associated with sequence-specific processing, including the inferior parietal and the dorsal premotor cortex (PMd), and in interconnecting superior temporal–middle frontal gyrus networks. Different patterns of activation in the left and right inferior parietal cortex were associated with different sequences, consistent with the speculation that sequences are encoded using different mnemonics, depending on the sequence-specific structure. In contrast, PMd activation correlated positively with increases in the number of transitions, consistent with the role of this area in the retrieval or preparation of abstract action plans. These findings suggest that the surface and the sequence-specific structure of sequential movements can be distinguished by distinct distributed systems that support their underlying mental operations.


Key Words: Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging • Sequencing • Sequence complexity • Movement representations • Parietal lobe • Prefrontal cortex • Extrastriate cortex • Cerebellum




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. Arunachalam, V. S. Weerasinghe, and K. R. Mills
Motor Control of Rapid Sequential Finger Tapping in Humans
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2005; 94(3): 2162 - 2170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Learn. Mem.Home page
C. Exner, J. Koschack, and E. Irle
The Differential Role of Premotor Frontal Cortex and Basal Ganglia in Motor Sequence Learning: Evidence From Focal Basal Ganglia Lesions
Learn. Mem., November 1, 2002; 9(6): 376 - 386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
B. Haslinger, P. Erhard, N. Kampfe, H. Boecker, E. Rummeny, M. Schwaiger, B. Conrad, and A. O. Ceballos-Baumann
Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging in Parkinson's disease before and after levodopa
Brain, March 1, 2001; 124(3): 558 - 570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
K. Y. Haaland, D. L. Harrington, and R. T. Knight
Neural representations of skilled movement
Brain, November 1, 2000; 123(11): 2306 - 2313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
C. Marshuetz, E. E. Smith, J. Jonides, J. DeGutis, and T. L. Chenevert
Order Information in Working Memory: fMRI Evidence for Parietal and Prefrontal Mechanisms
J. Cogn. Neurosci., November 1, 2000; 12(90002): 130S - 144.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 1999 by The MIT Press.